<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title> Benjamin Golub's Blog - Latest Comments in URL Canonicalization: Stop the Dupes!</title><link>http://benjamingolub.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 19:30:34 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: URL Canonicalization: Stop the Dupes!</title><link>http://benjamingolub.com/2008/04/15/url-canonicalization-stop-the-dupes/#comment-1222938</link><description>There is also a way to sort the problem by adding a snippet of code into you .htaccess fil, but I didn't know about these features...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks for the links and keep up the good articles, this is the 3rd article ive read now and I've learnt something new from all of them =D&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Jordan</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Url Canonicalization</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 19:30:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: URL Canonicalization: Stop the Dupes!</title><link>http://benjamingolub.com/2008/04/15/url-canonicalization-stop-the-dupes/#comment-465134</link><description>Well, I've been bitten by this too. However, since my dataset was small and performance wasn't an issue, I tried HEADing every url, with the result that quite a few sites don't respond very well to HEADs :(</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">yuvipanda</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 16:28:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: URL Canonicalization: Stop the Dupes!</title><link>http://benjamingolub.com/2008/04/15/url-canonicalization-stop-the-dupes/#comment-420952</link><description>FeedBurner sometimes gives this out; most of the time it doesn't though.  It looked to me like maybe a setting in FeedBurner can enable this?  I use it if it's available; if not I have no other choice but do follow the redirect to find it.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bgolub</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 11:16:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: URL Canonicalization: Stop the Dupes!</title><link>http://benjamingolub.com/2008/04/15/url-canonicalization-stop-the-dupes/#comment-420928</link><description>I remember when looking at google shared feeds, is that 95% of the items have the actual *final* url of the story, under original-id tag.  Do you not use that at all in aggregation efforts?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">smazurov</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 11:10:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: URL Canonicalization: Stop the Dupes!</title><link>http://benjamingolub.com/2008/04/15/url-canonicalization-stop-the-dupes/#comment-340123</link><description>No problem; glad I could help!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bgolub</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 19:37:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: URL Canonicalization: Stop the Dupes!</title><link>http://benjamingolub.com/2008/04/15/url-canonicalization-stop-the-dupes/#comment-340021</link><description>Thanks for the tip...I just made the switch to &lt;a href="http://www.sixteenseven.com/gReader" rel="nofollow"&gt;gReader Comments&lt;/a&gt;.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">paularterburn</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 19:08:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: URL Canonicalization: Stop the Dupes!</title><link>http://benjamingolub.com/2008/04/15/url-canonicalization-stop-the-dupes/#comment-340006</link><description>I have to disagree; FriendFeed is about discussion within (and extending slightly out of) your group of friends.  I'm glad they don't merge everything together but it would be nice to see what other people have to say about a story.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bgolub</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 19:01:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: URL Canonicalization: Stop the Dupes!</title><link>http://benjamingolub.com/2008/04/15/url-canonicalization-stop-the-dupes/#comment-339824</link><description>I beg to differ that FriendFeed doesn't need to bother with it.  Well, OK, they don't &lt;i&gt;need&lt;/i&gt; to, but it would make the service that much more convenient for users, if identical items were combined and the discussion merged... Just beating the dead horse. :-)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Voyagerfan5761</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 18:13:32 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>